Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Prudential Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold J. Crawford, J.

In an action to recover the face value of two alleged insurance policies, the defendant Prudential Insurance Company (hereinafter called “Prudential”) in an omnibus motion seeks (1) to dismiss the four causes of action in the complaint for legal insufficiency, or (2) to dismiss the third and fourth causes of action pursuant to subdivision 7 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or (3) to make the complaint more definite and certain and to separately state and number the causes of action, or (4) to strike out certain paragraphs pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or (5)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Bible v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Red Robin Stores, Inc. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Abbott v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Goldberg v. Colonial Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cavallo v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Suburban Lawn Service v. Allstate InsuranceSuffolk County District Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API