Nord v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from, District Court, Cascade County; J. B. Leslie, Judge Action by Neis Nord against the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injury caused by the alleged'negligence of the defendant. For the purposes of this decision, a sufficient statement of the ease will be found in the opinion delivered by this court on the former appeal. (Nord v. Boston & Mont. C. C. & S. M. Co., 30 Mont. 48, 75 Pac. 681.) Upon another trial the jury found in favor of the plaintiff. The present appeal is from the judgment rendered upon the verdict, and from an order overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial.
Counsel for plaintiff makes the contention that the order denying the motion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ball v. GussenhovenMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Kennon v. GilmerMontana Supreme Court · 1882
- Nord v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
- Curtis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by7 opinions
- Birsch v. Citizens' Electric Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
- Colonial Refining Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Longpre v. Big Blackfoot Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- McCartan v. Park Butte Theater Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1936
- Badovinac v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.