Legal Opinion
United States v. Jimmie Elvis Blankenship (90-6417), and Billy Hoyt Blankenship (90-6461)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1992No. 90-6417, 90-6461PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Jimmie Elvis Blankenship (“Jimmie Elvis”) and Billy Hoyt Blankenship (“Billy Hoyt”) were charged with cocaine trafficking and using and carrying firearms in relation to such drug trafficking offenses. Jimmie Elvis pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine and possessing cocaine with the intent to distribute. He appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”). Billy Hoyt appeals his conviction of all charges for which he was indicted. We AFFIRM Billy Hoyt’s conviction and REMAND Jimmie Elvis’s sentence to the District Court for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Charles Vinson, United States of America v. Arlie B. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Juan A. Acosta-CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jeffrey Wayne DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- The United States of America v. Patricia Poole, A/K/A Patricia HunterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Larry BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Gilberto Martinez (03-3833), Jerel Henderson (03-3835), Kevin S. Harris (03-3879), Brian Garrett (03-3917)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Alberto Gessa, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Mark Henry VincentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Rudolph KeszthelyiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.