Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Vanstrum

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1904No. Nos. 13,798—(80)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Kittson county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Watts, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Action to determine adverse claims to real estate. The court made findings to the effect that defendant was the owner of the property — a lot in the village of Hallock — and ordered judgment in accordance with .the findings which were entered. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff is the daughter of J. A. Vanstrum, deceased, who at the time of his death, November 29, 1902, was register of deeds of Kittson county. She claimed title under a duly probated will devising her father’s entire estate, valued at about $10,000. Defendant is -the nephew of deceased, and claims under a warranty deed of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conlan v. GraceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Patrick v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Fenton v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Lee v. FletcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Barnard v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bush v. CrowtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. In Re Declaration of Trust by BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Oehler v. FalstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Leach v. LeachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API