Legal Opinion
Reilly v. Shapiro
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 7, 1936No. 30,573PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Intervener appeals from a judgment. The only error assigned is that the conclusions of law are not supported by the findings of fact.
The facts are not in dispute and may be summarized thus: Joseph HoAvard Reilly was struck doAvn by an automobile driAren by defendant, Shapiro, on October 18, 1933, and received such injuries that shortly thereafter he died. Plaintiff, his surviAdng wife, was duly appointed administratrix of his estate, and she brought this action to recover damages under the death by wrongful act statute. 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9657. As a result of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tobin v. HaackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- State v. NestavalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. LindskogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Mechling v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Williams v. ReidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Weber Ex Rel. Weber v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State on Behalf of Forslund v. BronsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Koep v. KargerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- In Re Estate of KargerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Jung v. St. Paul Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.