Shell Oil Co. v. Pollution Control Board
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE KARNS,
specially concurring:
I concur in the opinion of the court as I believe it adopts the appropriate standard for judicial review of rule-making proceedings before the Pollution Control Board.
Sections 29 and 41 of the Environmental Protection Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 111½, pars. 1029, 1041) afford persons “adversely affected or threatened” an opportunity to seek immediate review of the Board’s rules. These provisions thrust the judiciary into a review of administrative rule making immediately after a rule is adopted and are, to my knowledge, unique in their…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.