Legal Opinion

Federal Corp. v. Radtke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the court erred in holding that the defendant, Radtke, was not entitled to recover the payments made by him on the note and contract subsequent to the date of their alteration. A brief summary of the facts will be necessary. On June 20, 1935, the defendant, Radtke, purchased an automobile from Emmett Wright and Willard Wright, copartners, then doing business under the firm name of Wright Brothers Motor Company, the purchase price of which, including a radio, was $782. The defendant, Radtke, turned in his old car for a credit of $237, paid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunnebacke Co. v. PittmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. County of Sheboygan v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Morley-Murphy Co. v. Van VreedeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Richland County Bank v. Joint School District No. 2 of BoazWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. HussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baugh v. DarleyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. A & a Metal Buildings v. I-S, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. HethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Conrad v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Weber v. Sunset Ridge, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API