Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Ray

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1938No. 5 Div. 58PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

At the time of his death, the insured, Virgil Ray, held a policy, upon which all premiums had been duly paid, of the appellant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, insuring his life for $545. There was attached to the policy an “Industrial Policy Accidental Death Benefit” certificate, referred to in the- evidence as a “rider,” which provided:

“Upon receipt of due proof that the insured * * * has sustained, after the date of this policy, bodily injuries, solely through external, violent and accidental means, resulting, directly and independently of all other causes, in the death of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stetson v. StindtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  2. Protective Life Ins. Co. v. SwinkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Prudential Casualty Co. v. CurryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Holcombe Bowden v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alabama Waterproofing Co., Inc. v. HanbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Donavan v. FandrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. S. D. Winn Cigar Co. v. WilsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Stremming Veneer Co. v. Jacksonville Blow Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co. v. SturdivantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API