Legal Opinion

Lietzke v. City of Birmingham (MAG+)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 9, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00206Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION BILL LIETZKE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 2:21-cv-206-ECM-JTA ) (WO) CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, Alabama, ) and PATRICK D. SMITH, Chief, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION On May 3, 2023, the court ordered that, on or before May 17, 2023, Lietzke shall SHOW CAUSE why he should not be sanctioned for violating Rule 11(b)(1)-(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by repetitively filing the same case against Defendants City of Birmingham and Patrick D. Smith knowing that his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Baker v. AldermanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API