Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Harp

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 31, 1985No. CV 84-4235 PARPublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CERTIFYING CLASS

RYMER, District Judge.

This is a securities fraud action brought by three purchasers of Vector Graphics common stock: Arthur Schwartz, Robert *281Greco, and LouAnn Greco. Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated Rule 10b-5 when they failed to disclose material adverse facts in their Prospectus and Registration Statement effective October 14, 1981 (Complaint, HIT 25, 26, 35); in their Second Quarter Report issued February 17, 1982 (Complaint, . HH 28, 35); and in their Third Quarter Report issued on or about May 12, 1982 (Complaint, Till 29, 35). Plaintiff Schwartz purchased…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Rafael Sandoval v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Adams v. ReaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API