Berman v. Blankenship Motors
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal upon the ground that the notice of appeal came too late.
Defendants, respondents here, presented a motion for a new trial but the court denied the motion. On the same day the clerk made -a note thereof in his rough minutes and the next day the court’s ruling was duly entered in the regular minutes. The date of this entry, however, was of the date of the ruling.
Section 939, Code of Civil Procedure, provides: “If proceedings on motion for a new trial are pending, the time *135for appeal from the judgment shall not expire until thirty days after entry in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. Scott, County Com'r.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jablon v. HennebergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Grande v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Seaboard Surety Corp. v. Hollywood State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936