Legal Opinion

Chaplin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 17, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

The will of Mary E. Bradford, late of Lewiston (whose decease occurred in 1917), created a trust. The trust attached, and the trustees qualified. They later disagreed. The trouble arose over the selling price of certain shares of the capital stock of a merchandising corporation, located and doing business in the former home city of the testatrix. Some of the shares the testatrix herself had owned; the rest the trustees had received as a dividend. The will provided that the trustees might retain the investment without fear of personal loss. This provision did not, it might be noted in passing,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hale v. HaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gavin v. CurtinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ridley v. HallidayTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Miller v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Cassidy v. ShimminMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Canal National Bank v. NoyesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  2. Indian Head National Bank v. TheriaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API