Moldawer v. Trust Co. of North America
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 154, Oct. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1909, No. 3,931, for plaintiff for nominal damages in case of Michael Moldawer v. Trust Company of North America. Assumpsit to recover for the value of a promissory note. The facts appear by the report of Moldawer v. Trust Co. of North America, 57 Pa. Superior Ct. 66, and by the opinion of the Superior Court, infra. Error assigned was in entering judgment for plaintiff for $1.00.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Head, J.,
All of the facts material to the determination of the question now presented were fully stated in the opinion of President Judge Rice on a former appeal, to wit, Moldawer v. Trust Company of N. America, 57 Pa. Superior Ct. 66. After a verdict for plaintiff for the full amount of his claim the learned trial judge had favorably entertained a motion for judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. From that judgment the plaintiff appealed. We there determined that although the plaintiff had failed to establish that the loss of his note vías due to any negligent act on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Hamilton v. CunninghamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia · 1828
- Merchants & Manufacturers Bank v. Stafford National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- Moldawer v. Trust Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jacobs v. Mohnton Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Stewart v. Pen Argyl National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- First National Bank v. LarssonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Guardianship of CasadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Guardianship of CasadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951