In re the Detention of Morgan
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentStephens, J.
¶31 (dissenting) — An individual facing detention as a sexually violent predator (SVP) should have a procedural due process right to be competent at trial. This is essential to the integrity of the SVP statutory scheme and our constitutional obligations. As the majority recognizes, “It is well settled that civil commitment is a significant deprivation of liberty.” Majority at 320 (citing In re Det. of Stout, 159 Wn.2d 357, 369, 150 P.3d 86 (2007)). For this reason, the quasi-criminal statutory scheme under which persons are civilly committed as SVPs for treatment in the Special Commitment…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.