Legal Opinion

Wineburgh v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1964No. Claim No. 37747PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts, by fixing the damage for the direct appropriation at $24,000, with costs to claimant, and matter remitted to the Court of Claims for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum. Certain finding of fact disapproved and reversed and new finding made. Memorandum: This is an appeal from a judgment awarding the claimant damages for the appropriation of land and its consequences. At the outset we point out that the award is in *962one sunn and does not indicate the amount of damage suffered by the direct appropriation or the consequential…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wineburgh v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. BSF Realty, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Carillion Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API