Legal Opinion

State v. Travatello

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1975No. 7419SC926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motions to suppress evidence. Upon each motion the court conducted a voir dire hearing and concluded that the evidence was admissible. We agree.

A search warrant will be presumed regular if no irregularity appears on the face of the record. State v. Spillars, 280 N.C. 341, 185 S.E. 2d 881 (1971). Attached to the warrant was the affidavit of Officer D. C. Frey of the Albemarle Police Department. Among other things set forth was the affiant’s familiarity with the investigation of a breaking and entering at Phillips Drug…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. SpillarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. RigsbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TrapperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. CourtrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. MayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. HaginCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API