Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. Dasher

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1986No. Docket 84920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtE. E. Borradaile, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order entered by the trial judge granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10), the court finding no genuine issue of material fact.

It appears that the defendants Dasher and Mate owned the premises in fee simple at 1374 Cleveland in Lincoln Park, Michigan, and on December 22, 1980, sold the property to plaintiff, Travis Tidwell, and defendant Marie Tidwell, who at that time were husband and wife, for the sum of $42,-500 with a $7,500 cash down payment and the balance to be paid on land contract at $350 per month,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gruskin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hooper v. Van HusanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Mary v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. French v. De BowMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. GoldwaterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Margita v. Diamond Mortgage Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Stebbins v. Concord Wrigley Drugs, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Nasser v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API