Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Commings

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from judgments on report of referee. Two actions by Catharine T. Carpenter, widow of John D. Carpenter, deceased, against Ellen C. Commings and against Albert C. Carpenter and others, to set aside certain conveyances executed by John D. Carpenter as in fraud of the dower rights of plaintiff. Complaints dismissed, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

John D. Carpenter, in October, 1877, was a widower, living in Ithaca, and then about.65 years of age. He had three children, viz.: Ellen C. Commings, the defendant in the first entitled action; Albert C. Carpenter, one of the defendants in the second action; and one Amanda C. Morgan. At the same time he was the owner in fee of the real estate described *948in the respective complaints. The plaintiff, Catharine T. Carpenter, was then a widow, also living in Ithaca. She had one child,—a daughter. She was considerably younger than John D. Some time in October, 1877, as the referee has found, she and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reade v. LivingstonNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  2. Jackson ex dem. Russell v. RowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Pierce v. . PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Hathaway v. . PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Borst v. . CoreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Davis v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API