Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cox

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1912No. 21,977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From 'Wabash. Circuit Court, A. 3. Plummer, Judge. Action by Flora Cox against William Davis. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellant was sued by appellee for breach of an alleged promise of marriage. The cause was tried by a *488jury, and a verdict rendered in favor of appellee, and over motion and causes for a new trial judgment was rendered against appellant.

The only error assigned here and relied on is that of overruling the motion for a new trial, on the grounds, principally, that the verdict is contrary to law and is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and we are urged to a consideration of the evidence as not being sufficient to support the verdict and judgment, owing to the claimed intervention of the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. McNutt v. McNuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sullivan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Eckman v. FunderburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Shaughnessey v. JordanIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Houston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API