Legal Opinion

Lovejoy v. Ahearn

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer

This cause comes to this Court from the action of the trial judge in sustaining pleas filed by the defendant in error, H. P. Ahearn, alleging the cross-declarations seeking recovery for personal injuries filed by the plaintiffs in error, Lloyd F. Lovejoy and James L. Lovejoy, pursuant to T.CA.. sec. 20-1007, were barred by the one-year statute of limitations, T.C.A. sec. 28-304.

This cause arises from a vehicle collision on July 30, 1966, in Loudon County, Tennessee, involving a vehicle owned and operated at the time by H. P. Ahearn, a resident of Florida, and a vehicle owned by James L.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mack v. Hugger Bros. Const. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Lewis v. TurnleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Harbison v. WelchTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Nunn v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Colella v. WhittTennessee Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Training Services, Inc. v. Commerce Union BankDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1976
  2. Brown v. HipshireTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Smith v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
  4. Maxwell v. RoarkDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API