Mack v. Hugger Bros. Const. Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook
The complainant is a resident of Illinois, engaged in making and applying a compound called “Rezilite,” used in surfacing floors. The defendant Hugger Bros. Construction Company is a building contractor whose corpo rate domicile is Alabama. The defendant erected the Scottish Rite Temple in Nashville, and contracted with complainant to lay a Rezilite floor in that building, for which a balance of $6,350 is payable.
Under another contract, complainant laid a Rezilite floor in a building constructed by the defendant com--pany at Greeneville, Ala., and a balance of $1,793 is payable to complainant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moore v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
- Blair v. A. Johnson & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BarefootTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- Irvine v. DeanTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
- McLean v. HoustonTennessee Supreme Court · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Riverside Park Realty Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1978
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1988
- Kelly v. Louisiana Oil Refining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- MacK v. Hugger Bros. ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
- Davis Erection Co., Inc. v. JorgensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.