Healy v. Woodruff
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action to quiet plaintiff’s title to certain waters of a stream called Cedar Creelc, audio a ditch leading therefrom, and for an injunction, *465etc. The court rendered judgment for plaintiff against the defendants Harrison Smith and Edward Bonyman,, as prayed for in the complaint; but as against the defendants James and John A. Smith and B. C. Woodruff, the judgment quieted plaintiff’s title to only one hundred and eighty inches of water, measured under a four-inch pressure. Plaintiff appealed from the judgment, and contends that the court’s conclusions of law were erroneous, and…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Pleasant Valley Canal Co. v. BorrorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. WorswickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Cave v. TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. McArthurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Rindge v. Crags Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.