Legal Opinion
Gregory Sanders v. William Bunnell, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1993No. 91-56413Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
988 F.2d 121
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Gregory SANDERS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William BUNNELL, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
California, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 91-56413.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 3, 1993.*
Decided March 11, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Norman Elmer Miller v. J.C. Keeney, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Leo BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- People v. RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.