Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Coe

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 25, 1995No. 75474Published

1DissentCovington, Judge

I must dissent. I cannot join the principal opinion because it condones abuse of the motion for rehearing, undermines the entire disciplinary process, gives credence to an apology extracted under duress, and applies an inadequate sanction.

Respondent’s conduct giving rise to the present proceeding occurred in 1990. On November 22, 1994, this Court handed down an opinion, in which I joined, suspending respondent from the practice of law for six months as a sanction for her unprofessional conduct. Judge Benton concurred in the opinion, writing:

To date, Respondent has made no sincere public…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ford v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Allen v. Globe-Democrat Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Phippin v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. In Re OberhellmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. In Re StormentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API