Legal Opinion

Zahorian v. Russell Fitt Real Estate Agency

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 19, 1973PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Jacobs, J.

The Appellate Division, in an unreported per curiam, affirmed the Division on Civil Rights’ finding of discrimination but modified the relief which it had directed. The Division on Civil Rights petitioned and the respondents cross-petitioned for certification. We granted both petitions. 60 N. J. 355 (1972).

*402The complainant Sandra Zahorian filed a verified complaint with the Division on Civil Rights, charging that the respondents had denied her the opportunity of renting a listed apartment solely because of her sex and marital status, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Keller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. FranzaroliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Andersen v. Exxon Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. García Pagán v. Shiley Caribbean, Shiley Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
  5. Tarr v. CiasulliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API