Legal Opinion

State v. Boller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1938No. 33,812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Defendant was convicted of having knowingly bought and received stolen automobiles, and appeals, assigning six claims of error.

He presents his first two claims of error together. They are that he did not have a fair and impartial trial, and that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the law and the evidence. Beyond mere statement of his contention, he presents no specific claim of lack of a fair trial except such as may be implied from matters which were developed on motion for a new trial, which will be considered later. There is no…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  2. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. State v. FarrarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. State v. LuftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BlockerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. State v. DyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API