Legal Opinion

Blair v. McQuary

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1917No. 20,663Published

Appeal from Dougias 'district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion

OPINION MODIFYING SYLLABUS AND DENYING ■ ' , A REHEARING.

The petition for a rehearing has been carefully considered. Our view as to the merits of the set-off pleaded by Junkins & Son is not shaken thereby and it needs no further discussion.

It is now suggested for the first time that the answer of Junkins & Son was not verified under section 110 of the civil code. To this there are two answers, either of which is sufficient. The action originated in the court of a justice of the peace where no written pleadings of any sort were necessary. (German v. Ritchie, 9 Kan. 106; Wagstaff v. Challiss,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emery v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Bolen Coal Co. v. Whittaker Brick Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Stanley v. Farmers' BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. German v. RitchieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Hart v. HaynesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API