Legal Opinion

Pinkerton & Laws Co. v. Nashville Flying Service, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chattin

Pinkerton and Laws Company, for its own use and for the use of American Motorists Insurance Company, has appealed from the action of the trial court in sustaining a demurrer to its declaration and has assigned error.

The allegations of the declaration, which on this appeal must be taken as true, are that on July 13, 1962, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant, Nashville Flying Service, Inc., whereby the defendant agreed for a valuable consideration to perform a 100-hour inspection of an airplane; to service the plane and to make such repairs as might be needed to render the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bodne v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hackworth v. Ralston Purina CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harvest Corp. v. Ernst & WhinneyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  2. Williams v. ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Simpson v. Sumner CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  4. The District of Columbia Armory Board v. D. G. Volkert, T/a Ewin Engineering Associates, and Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  5. George Moore, Jr. v. City of Clarksville, TNCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API