Legal Opinion

Eyman v. National Union Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1941No. 34,893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

In 1927 plaintiff gave an oil and gas lease on 160 acres of land. At the times hereinafter mentioned the defendant was the owner of the lease.

The operations of defendant which caused the damage complained of in the petition occurred on the east half of the southeast quarter of the section. The dwelling house is located in the northeast corner of the south forty. Wildcat creek is a stream running from the southwest to the northeast, coming into the south forty on the west line and running in a northerly and easterly direction until it crosses…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway v. MihlmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Union Trust Co. v. CuppySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Sullivan v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. City of Kansas City v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Miller v. Cudahy Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1983
  3. Peterson v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Monfort v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  5. Adams v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API