A.D. Kincaid v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for incest; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.
There are twelve bills of exceptions, each of which has been carefully considered, but none of which are believed to present error. The indictment charged as follows: “Did then and there unlawfully carnally know Mattie Lou Giles, the said Mattie Lou Giles then and there being the daughter of Mrs. Annie Giles, the sister of the said A. D. Kincaid.” Appellant attacks the sufficiency of this averment, insisting that it is indefinite and. does not enable him to know therefrom whether Mattie Lou Giles or Mrs. Annie…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kugadt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Chapman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Fredrickson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Joe Edward Smith v. The State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Fernandez v. BetoDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1968
- De La Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.