Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Loucks

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

We are not favored with a copy of the notice of motion, if any, of either party. The oral argument, papers submitted and briefs indicate that the defendants ask for summary judgment on the ground that the alleged cause of action did not accrue within the time limited for its commencement, and that the plaintiff asks for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that all the allegations of the complaint are admitted and that the action is timely brought.

The complaint alleges that on March 8, 1930, a judgment was entered in Justice’s Court for the sum of $219.38; that said judgment was based on a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Carshore v. HuyckNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  3. City of Harper v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  4. In re BermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. Brammell v. WolfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HydeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  2. LaSalle Extension University v. BarrUnited States District Court · 1941
  3. Truscon Steel Co. of Canada, Ltd. v. BieglerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  4. Abby Financial Corp. v. AngelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API