Legal Opinion

Taliaferro v. Insurance Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1956No. Civ. 16840PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

The petitioner-appellant, doing business in San Pablo under the name of Davis Auto Exchange, is engaged in the dismantling of automobiles, the repair of automobiles, and the sale of new and used parts including parts derived from his" dismantling operation.

He brought this proceeding in mandamus, pursuant to the provisions of section 11754.5 of the Insurance Code, to review a decision of the Insurance Commissioner which reclassified portions of his payroll to classifications which called for higher premium rates than those which he had paid to his insurer upon a workmen’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American Building Maintenance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Serenko v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. California Radioactive Materials Management Forum v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. National Fire Insurance Company v. Housing Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. Texas Steel Erection Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API