Legal Opinion

Ohio National Bank v. Bright

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1941No. 3312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Probate Court in favor of defendants-appellees, Martha S. Pittman, Tom Pittman and Cleone Hawkins upon the construction of the will of George W. Bright, deceased.

That portion of the will of George W. Bright immediately under consideration is Item XI, as follows:

“I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved foster daughter, Helen M. Quinn, who has been so faithful to me and my family, one-third (1/3) of my entire estate whether real, personal and mixed, and wheresoever situated which I may own or have the right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rapp v. Bethel-Tate Consolidated School DistOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Hawthorne v. City of East PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hummel v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Welles v. PapeOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Under Will of DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Boyle v. KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Lotz v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API