Hawthorne v. City of East Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah County.
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
This motion was filed on the part of the respondent herein to dismiss the appeal taken from the Circuit Court for the county of Multnomah by the appellants. The grounds of the motion were that no undertaking on appeal had been filed as required 'by law. Upon the filing of said motion *211the appellant filed what is termed a cross-motion, for leave to perfect the said appeal by filing a new undertaking in this court. The filing of the latter motion is, in effect, a confession of the fact that no sufficient undertaking has been filed; and hence the only question for our determination is, whether…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Moore v. HallidayOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Isaak v. JourneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Ohio National Bank v. BrightOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
- Hulegaard v. GarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Rogers v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.