Legal Opinion

Dilley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 19, 2009No. C 07-1831 PJHPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.

Defendants’ motion for a protective order came on for hearing before this court on March 18, 2009. Plaintiff Marianne Dilley appeared by her counsel Lissa A. Martinez, and defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Bank of America Long Term Disability Benefits Plan appeared by their counsel Rebecca A. Hull. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the motion as follows and for the reasons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nolan v. Heald CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  2. Lavino v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
  3. Zewdu v. Citigroup Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Arrabito v. First Unum Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  5. Balkin v. UNUM Life Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API