Nolan v. Heald College
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VAUGHN R. WALKER, Chief Judge.
On May 6, 2010, Magistrate Judge Larson issued a report and recommendation (“report”) that the court grant plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record and deny defendants’ cross-motion for judgment. Doc. # 120. Defendants filed a motion objecting to the report and requesting de novo review. Doc. # 121. For the reasons set forth below, the court adopts in large part the recommendation of the magistrate and ORDERS entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff Jeanne Nolan.
I
A
The relevant facts have been set forth on many different occasions, and the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lavino v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Backman v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Bledsoe v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Fifield v. HM Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
- Phillips v. Clark County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.