Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Heald College

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 27, 2010No. C 05-3399 VRWPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VAUGHN R. WALKER, Chief Judge.

On May 6, 2010, Magistrate Judge Larson issued a report and recommendation (“report”) that the court grant plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record and deny defendants’ cross-motion for judgment. Doc. # 120. Defendants filed a motion objecting to the report and requesting de novo review. Doc. # 121. For the reasons set forth below, the court adopts in large part the recommendation of the magistrate and ORDERS entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff Jeanne Nolan.

I

A

The relevant facts have been set forth on many different occasions, and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lavino v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
  2. Backman v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. Bledsoe v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. Fifield v. HM Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  5. Phillips v. Clark County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API