Legal Opinion
Sheets v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority
California Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1961No. L. A. No. 25745PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The legal problem involved on this appeal is a limited one. The facts, however, are somewhat complicated.
*484Prior to March 3, 1958, there were two transit companies furnishing mass transit in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. One was the Los Angeles Transit Lines, primarily an urban system, and the other was Metropolitan Coach Lines, primarily an interurban system. Both companies had collective bargaining agreements with separate unions. Los Angeles Transit Lines had such an agreement with the Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of American (hereafter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Triboro Coach Corp. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Modine Manufacturing Company v. Grand Lodge International Association of MacHinists Local Union No. 1382 of International Association of MacHinistsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. A. D. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martin v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965