Legal Opinion

State v. Bowsher

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 2010No. CR-10-0019-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Justice.

¶ 1 The issue for decision is whether a trial court may impose consecutive terms of probation on a defendant convicted of unrelated offenses. We hold that Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 13-903(A) (2010) authorizes that disposition.

I

¶ 2 Bowsher was charged in two separate indictments with ten felonies. Pursuant to a plea agreement, he pleaded guilty to one count of theft by control in each case; each count involved a different victim and event. The trial court placed Bowsher on probation for four years in both matters and ordered the probation terms to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. MottArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. PandeliArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. CaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Premier Physicians Group, PLLC v. NavarroArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  3. Rasmussen v. MungerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State v. SerratoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
  5. Alex Paul Rasmussen v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API