State v. Bowsher
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Justice.
¶ 1 The issue for decision is whether a trial court may impose consecutive terms of probation on a defendant convicted of unrelated offenses. We hold that Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 13-903(A) (2010) authorizes that disposition.
I
¶ 2 Bowsher was charged in two separate indictments with ten felonies. Pursuant to a plea agreement, he pleaded guilty to one count of theft by control in each case; each count involved a different victim and event. The trial court placed Bowsher on probation for four years in both matters and ordered the probation terms to be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. MottArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PandeliArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Premier Physicians Group, PLLC v. NavarroArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Rasmussen v. MungerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. SerratoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
- Alex Paul Rasmussen v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.