Legal Opinion

White v. Strong

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 5, 1902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action for an injunction to restrain the defendant from acting as guardian of the property of the plaintiff’s minor son, brought to the Superior Court in Middlesex County where a demurrer to the complaint was sustained (Case, J.'), and, after a motion to amend the complaint had been denied (Ralph Wheeler, judgment was rendered for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appealed for alleged errors in the rulings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

The complaint in this case contains the following allegations, in substance: The plaintiff is the natural guardian of his minor son, Frederick Hall White, who is about seventeen years of age, and who, until recently, has lived on pleasant terms with the plaintiff at his home in Brooklyn, New York. Said son has no brothers or sisters, and in case of his death the plaintiff will be his only heir. Said minor is the owner of and heir to property of the value of $100,000, situated in this State and consisting largely of dioses in action, bonds, and other personal property, which he inherited from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunnett v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  2. Dickinson v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
  3. Adams' Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  4. Bailey v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  5. Lancaster's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kerin v. StangleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Appeal of SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Buchholz's Appeal from ProbateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. Hirsch v. BracelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  5. Ferrie v. TrentiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API