Neal v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Motion by the defendant, The Liverpool and London and Globe Insurance Company, Limited, for a new trial upon a case containing exceptions, ordered to be heard at the Appellate Division in the first instance upon the rendition of á verdict in plaintiff’s favor by a jury at the Erie Trial Term in May, 1916.
1Opinion of the Court
Kruse, P. J.:
The action is upon an insurance policy issued by the defendant upon a motorcycle, covering loss by theft. The defendant contends (1) that the policy does not cover the loss, (2) that the plaintiff failed to give notice and serve proof of loss as required by the policy, (3) that proof of theft is lacking, and (4) the court erred in admitting certain evidence. The policy insured the plaintiff and one George M. Arthur “ as interest may appear,” to an amount not exceeding $300, covering among other losses, “ loss or damage if amounting to Twenty-five dollars ($25) or more on any…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Foreign Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Canales v. Stuyvesant InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Fred v. Pacific Indemnity CompanyHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- Fred v. Pacific Indemnity CompanyHawaii Supreme Court · 1972