Application of Hyland C. Flint
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1ConcurrenceNeese, Judge
I concur with the result separately for the sole purpose of respeetifully disassociating my views from those of the majority to the extent that there is reliance on In re Chandler, 319 F.2d 211, 225, 50 CCPA 1422 [3] (1963). That decision, giving sanction sub silento to a patent examining procedure, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, § 706.03(1), which is inharmonious with 35 U.S.C.A. § 112, ought not to be followed, but reversed.
So important is the benefit of the genius, meditation and skill of creators and innovators to our national sovereign and its people, Kendall v. Winsor, 21 U.S.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.