Bowman v. Cudworth
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.:. In an action to recover land the defendant, Cudworth, had a verdict, which the Court set aside on application of plaintiff, and the defendant appeals from the order vacating the verdict and granting a new trial. No opinion was filed when the new trial was granted, and we are not informed upon what grounds the order was based. The appellant’s counsel claims, *150that the only ground presented in the statement upon which the Court could have based its action, is, error in law in admitting in evidence the judgment roll in the case of Hastings v. Cudworth et al., or in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Killey v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- McCreery v. EverdingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Schlitz v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Smith v. CaldwellMontana Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.