Legal Opinion

Princeton Community Phone Book, Inc. v. Bate

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 23, 1978No. 77-2032PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises a number of issues concerning Opinion 290 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics of the New Jersey Supreme Court, prohibiting members of the New Jersey Bar from paying the Princeton Community Phone Book, Inc. to list their names, addresses and telephone numbers in the classified section of its publication. Plaintiffs sued claiming that, by adoption of Opinion 290, the defendants injured them by (a) depriving them of their constitutional rights,1 in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983,2 and (b) by restraining competition among…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Three Boys Music Corp. v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Selected Risks Insurance Company v. Bruno, Anthony v. And Bruno, Lucy C., His Wife, and Bruno, Jr., AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Lawrence Abram Benson, D.D.S. v. Arizona State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. A & M RECORDS, INC. v. Napster, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
  5. Altman v. AltmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API