Legal Opinion
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Mitsui & Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 22, 1999No. C2-98-1122PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARGUS, District Judge.
On November 20, 1998, Plaintiff, Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation (“Wheeling-Pitt”) filed its First Amended Complaint which sets forth three (3) counts. On December 8, 1998, all defendants, various importers of Japanese and Russian hot-rolled steel, filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Docs.49/50) The Motion is before the Court for disposition. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I
A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goss International Corporation v. Man Roland Druckmaschinen AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Goss International Corp. v. Druckmaschinen AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Goss International Corp. v. Druckmaschinen AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006