Russell v. Hurd
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action of assumpsit. Error to the County Court of Peoria County; the Hon. Wilbert I. Slemiioks, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1903.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers
This is an action of assumpsit brought by defendant in error against plaintiff in error, to recover §250 claimed to be due as commission for services of defendant in error as a real estate broker. A trial was had in the Peoria Circuit Court without a jury, resulting in a finding for defendant in error and assessing his damages at the amount of his claim, to which exceptions were taken and the plaintiff in 'error brings the record up on writ of error.
The facts are not seriously controverted.
Defendant in error is a real estate agent in Peoria. Plaintiff in error was the owner of real estate in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lawrence v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Carter v. WebsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Wheeler v. LesterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1850
- King v. City of ShelbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Frankenstein v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by1 opinion
- Easter v. NewburyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912