Legal Opinion

Lucas v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1987No. 83-537PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

Appellant, Lucas, was tried as an adult on charges of first-degree murder and related offenses allegedly committed when he was sixteen years old. He was acquitted of the principal charge, but convicted of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter. We reversed that conviction on appeal because of an error by, the trial judge. On retrial for manslaughter, Lucas was once again convicted of that offense. This, his second appeal, presents the question whether Lucas was properly tried a second time as an adult, given that the original predicate for trying him as an adult…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Dyson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Sheilah C. Hicks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. MacK v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. VelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Walker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API