Legal Opinion
Keen v. Keen
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1986PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the ground that the movant is not a party to so much of the action as was severed and finally disposed of as against the corporate defendants (CPLR 5511).
Judge Hancock, Jr., taking no part.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Marine Midland Bank v. MurkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Gloria Baker v. Latham Sparrowbush Associates and Aaron KozakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Blakeslee v. RabinorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Gentry v. Kovler (In Re Kovler)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Hebert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.