Legal Opinion

Kaminsky v. Kahn

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

Plaintiff was awarded, after trial, an interlocutory judgment, directing defendant to account in respect of certain shares of stock involving Spear & Company and Acme Hamilton Manufacturing Corporation and otherwise. Defendant has appealed from that judgment, and plaintiff has cross-appealed from so much of the decision that denied plaintiff certain further relief prayed for. The interlocutory judgment was dated September 14, 1964, but for the reasons indicated in the memorandum of the Special Referee, filed herewith, the accounting proceedings have not come to hearing.

In the meanwhile, it…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sequa Capital Corp. v. NaveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Demirovic v. OrtegaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  3. Gallegos v. Elite Model Management Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API