Legal Opinion

Dunlop Tire Corp. v. Allen

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 31, 1995No. 2940004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In February 1993, Mickey Allen filed a complaint for workers' compensation benefits against Dunlop Tire Corporation. Allen alleged that on August 21, 1992,1 he injured his knee in the line and scope of his employment and, as a result, suffered a permanent partial disability. Following ore tenus proceedings, the trial court found that Allen had suffered a 55% loss of earning capacity and a 67% permanent partial disability to his entire body as a result of the injury to his knee. The trial court awarded Allen benefits accordingly. Dunlop appeals.

Dunlop argues three issues on appeal: (1) whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Edwards v. Jesse Stutts, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Ex Parte VeazeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ex Parte LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Beatrice Foods Company v. ClemonsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Dunlop Tire Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Oden v. Gulf States Steel, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Cox v. North River HomesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. CranfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. McCoy v. Wrangler, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API