Legal Opinion

Watts v. Moussette

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 30, 1935PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a guest case to recover $15,000 for personal injuries alleged to have been received in an automobile collision. On trial to a jury verdict went for defendants. Plaintiff's motion for a new trial was sustained and defendants appealed.

The trial court at the time a new trial was granted filed a memorandum stating the reasons for sustaining the motion as follows: "Instruction No. 3 offered by and given upon behalf of the defendants submitted general negligence when specific negligence was pleaded. It was broader than the pleadings and broader than the evidence; The court erred in giving…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bond v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Conduitt v. Trentonton Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Benjamin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Peppers v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Bobos Ex Rel. Enders v. Krey Packing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Kansas City Gas CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. Long v. MildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Branson v. Abernathy Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Stanich v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Dilallo v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API